From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 17:46:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B19816A4CF; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:46:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C0B43D54; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:46:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2AHlOB3087354; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:47:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42308769.5080506@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:44:09 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Richards References: <422E407B.4080507@portaone.com> <86k6oht386.fsf@xps.des.no> <422F087F.9030906@portaone.com> <20050309.085035.129356491.imp@bsdimp.com> <422F6703.70409@portaone.com> <20050310161607.GO98930@myrddin.originative.co.uk> <86d5u7fn1z.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050310171917.GQ98930@myrddin.originative.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20050310171917.GQ98930@myrddin.originative.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org cc: Maxim Sobolev cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: alfred@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav cc: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_socket.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:46:47 -0000 Paul Richards wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 06:06:16PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > >>Paul Richards writes: >> >>>Imagine something like Photoshop being written on the most recent >>>version of Mac OS X and finding that compatibility only worked >>>forward. That would mean that most users out there would have to >>>upgrade their OS in order to use the most recent version of Photoshop! >> >>Yes, that is usually how it goes. > > > I don't believe it does. Can anyone provide real world examples of > this happening that we can consider? > You know, I'm completely outraged that I can't use MSWord 2005 on my Windows 3.1 system! I even installed the win32s library! Don't those bozos at Microsoft care at all about forwards compatibility? Scott