From owner-freebsd-security Wed Dec 23 05:45:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA18326 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Wed, 23 Dec 1998 05:45:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA18320 for ; Wed, 23 Dec 1998 05:45:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA48504; Wed, 23 Dec 1998 14:45:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: Fernando Schapachnik Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sendmail configuration References: <199812231303.KAA27496@ns1.sminter.com.ar> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 23 Dec 1998 14:45:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: Fernando Schapachnik's message of "Wed, 23 Dec 1998 10:03:06 -0300 (GMT)" Message-ID: Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Fernando Schapachnik writes: > If machine A is acting as proxy for machine B, then: > allow B's IP to send mail to any domain by adding it's IP in the allowed > IPs list. > Add B's domain in the allowed domains for relaying. > > At B, add the domain in variable w (eg, Cw domain.com), but do not > publish it in DNS. I don't control B, and it's not running Sendmail. It's not even running Unix. In fact, I don't think there's anybody in that company who really understands the software it runs, and the only guy who maybe does is quitting. But hey, I'm just a lowly consultant, and not a particularly well-paid one at that. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message