From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 16 23:46:38 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC4116A46E for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:46:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE2E13C459 for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:46:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from kanga.digitaltorque.ca (hs-216-106-102-70.storm.ca [216.106.102.70]) by mail.storm.ca (8.14.0+Sun/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lBGNSbRE006049 for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:28:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from piglet (unknown [192.168.1.5]) by kanga.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00649 for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by piglet (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 25F0FF4007; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:28:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:28:30 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071216232830.GD5874@piglet.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20071214010542.GA19553@demeter.hydra> <20071214022529.GA2571@kobe.laptop> <4761F17F.9030908@chuckr.org> <20071214033333.GA3455@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071214033333.GA3455@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Subject: Re: Apparently, csh programming is considered harmful. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:46:38 -0000 --ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14/12/07 Giorgos Keramidas said: > Tcsh is a fine shell. I'm using it all the time (that's how I found out > that a buglet reported by Kris Kennaway a few months ago was indeed a > bug which I could reproduce too). I always found csh/tcsh aliases annoying, since there are no shell function= s. I also found the shell redirection awkward.=20 It's ok otherwise, but I've since become addicted to bash. Mind you, I'm su= re some tcsh users could point out some features that bash doesn't have.=20 Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHZbSeKGqCc1vIvggRApfRAJ0bFX9yu9XX98dK0/DdtRHhNYX7VwCgtNE8 4g/5ql+h5/x6f2iDI1wJZBg= =lSvx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ylS2wUBXLOxYXZFQ--