From owner-freebsd-standards Tue Nov 26 20:26: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976F437B401; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:26:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from espresso.q9media.com (espresso.q9media.com [65.39.129.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0C843E4A; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 20:26:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@espresso.q9media.com) Received: by espresso.q9media.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id DE86D9BC3; Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:16:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:16:41 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft To: Juli Mallett Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org, re@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Approval to fix non-GCC users of Message-ID: <20021126231641.C67382@espresso.q9media.com> References: <20021126194219.A92609@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021126194219.A92609@FreeBSD.org>; from jmallett@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:42:19PM -0800 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [re@ probably doesn't need to be CC'd on this thread. I'm sure they have enough mail to read, but I'll include them anyway.] Juli Mallett writes: > The following patch fixes for use on i386 with > non-GCC consumers... __va_size is defined inside an if GNUC > block, but not used solely within an if GNUC block. This > allows me to compile a number of pieces of software I work > on with TenDRA 4.1.2 on -CURRENT again. > > It only "affects" things that would break, behaviour stays > the same for modern GCC (unrelated block) and for old GCC > (definition still in scope). > > I'd like to get approval to get this in for 5.0. I sent David O'Brien a similar patch about a week ago. IIRC, he's already seeking re@ approval. There are some other issues which prevented me from completing the latest TenDRA snapshot build. 1. The new #warning in isn't #if __GNUC__ ... #endif protected. Adding the protection doesn't fix it for some reason (ie. it's complaining about unknown CPP syntax in a conditional that doesn't apply.) I haven't looked to see what the C rule is for this, but I suspect TenDRA is doing something wrong. 2. TenDRA assumes an older POSIX system and makes wrong assumptions about some limits it happens to duplicate in its version of . Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message