From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jun 30 1:57:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dire.bris.ac.uk (dire.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.60]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E454A37B7C9 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 01:57:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk by dire.bris.ac.uk with SMTP-PRIV with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:57:48 +0100 Received: from localhost (cmjg@localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA27362; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:57:47 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 09:57:47 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant To: Fred Clift Cc: freebsd-questions@freeBSD.org Subject: Re: RBL/Sendmail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Fred Clift wrote: > My basic feeling about RBL is that the folks who run it are a bit > fanatical. At my past job, hosts which I controlled were submitted to RBL > not because any spam had been actually relayed through them but because of > the potential for relaying using a technique that was not yet in any, let > alone wide-spread use for relaying. This isn't the RBL policy! - I find it hard to believe that this happened. Are you sure you're not talking about ORBS? -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287163 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk Generalisation is never appropriate. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message