From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 16 14:42:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A661016A422 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:42:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41C243D77 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:42:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao.barros@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so509316wxc for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:42:09 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uqv5YVO2PLUw2HKGj5hyrluS5UfGrI769mefoU7yVctlhc2gMFopeE10LGqLY1+wNWyyga5O8NT15H2u71CQe7CLezyAV7uF3RYLQ1GR4NYyBOy2Yr3Clp54+2T5eMAoIEyK42dlYgyBqIxrI9f/8xYtDmL5QFdKV0HmxSous3o= Received: by 10.70.11.3 with SMTP id 3mr839859wxk; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:42:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.36.7 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:42:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <70e8236f0512160642y3c41c62dkdaf66d3fe68ec55f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:42:05 +0000 From: Joao Barros To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <43A26D4A.9080403@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200512140326.jBE3QnUT010666@repoman.freebsd.org> <70e8236f0512151455g1231cb7oa74aa7d54cfd5b18@mail.gmail.com> <43A26D4A.9080403@samsco.org> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/amr amr.c amr_cam.c amr_disk.c amr_pci.c amrio.h amrreg.h amrvar.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:42:13 -0000 On 12/16/05, Scott Long wrote: > Joao Barros wrote: > > On 12/14/05, Scott Long wrote: > > > > > Any specific testing in mind or just stability? > > I'm a bit worried that old controllers (especially ones that predate the > move to i960 CPUs) might be broken with this. But yeah, stability > testing is always welcome. I'll put my MegaRAID Elite 1600 to the task :-) > It got beat up for about 2 weeks straight, > so I'm pretty confident that it's solid. Any plans to MFC this to 6.x? > Kris Kenneway spent a couple of weeks doing parallel tarball extractions > to an AMR array under 6.0+mega_amr.diff in order to characterize SMP > contention and thoroughput. For the sake of consistent benchmarking and testing (6.0 vs 6.0+diff, not 6.0 vs CURRENT) could you provide the patch? -- Joao Barros