From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 30 12:56:57 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA29331 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 30 May 1995 12:56:57 -0700 Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA29312 for ; Tue, 30 May 1995 12:56:54 -0700 Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA11704; Tue, 30 May 95 13:49:59 MDT From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Message-Id: <9505301949.AA11704@cs.weber.edu> Subject: Re: FreeBSD as Netware client? -Reply To: bens@jhbs.com.au (Ben Seaman MIS) Date: Tue, 30 May 95 13:49:58 MDT Cc: SUPERVISOR@alb.asctmd.com, freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: from "Ben Seaman MIS" at May 30, 95 10:00:23 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52] Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > You might have more feedback if you could configure a FreeBSD system > > as a tunnel to tunnel IPX/SPX over a TCP/IP connection to link remote > > networks. Do you have routing support? Unfortunately, I'm not in > > an environment where I can even test it any more. > > We use FreeBSD boxes to do basic IP routing, and we may have a > requirement to route IPX as well. Does the code currently support this? The above quoted portion of my message is a request for clarification on this very issue. 8-). I *believe* routing was supported the last time the IPX code was discussed. Unfortunately, I can't remember for sure and alternet has been screwy for more than a week now, and it's near impossible for me to verify one way or the other without a reliable net connect to one of the places I archive crap. Terry Lambert terry@cs.weber.edu --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.