From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Apr  8 19:06:57 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA02434
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 19:06:57 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA02428
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 19:06:53 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.9/8.6.9) id SAA03488; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 18:59:42 -0700
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 1995 18:59:42 -0700
Message-Id: <199504090159.SAA03488@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jhs@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de
CC: ports@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <199504062325.BAA06954@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> (message from Julian Howard Stacey on Fri, 07 Apr 1995 01:25:05 +0200)
Subject: Re: Chinese/Korean liasions wanted
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami | =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * > I assume these are GB tools?  
 * Yup some of old fashioned taiwanese chinese,
 * & some of newer mainland chinese (the docs say Mao's arm didnt stretch
 * to the island when he forced the mainland to rationalise (mainly strip
 * the character set back a bit)

Now you've got me all confused. ;)  I always thought GB = Simplified,
and Big5 = Traditional.  Are you saying GB = Taiwanese/Mandarin, Big5
= Cantonese?

Well, whatever.  Is it ok to classify them by code systems (chinese-gb
& chinese-b5), or do we need to further divide GB into Taiwanese and
Mandarin? (?_?)

 * Ill clean & dump it in ~jhs/chinese on freefall

Thanks...I'll take a look....

Satoshi