From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 4 00:37:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861C016A4DA for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 00:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: from smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09A2143D46 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 00:37:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hakmi@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 18939 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2006 00:37:55 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE; b=FOKkAhSfMjl2XRxe3QmHyHtt2WCnwUHGbEokVhGCxluqj9jLESw2XRDTHu+cSEp46copbIssyP6z7hbQjGU3urRwMFyhLWiZWnkXf5atDMRHQDNxPZvQUCIIUI8CIlhQyZiEm+PNEyRinPnNCmfSrmMScFIOM1JxyMlEk0vZBTw= ; Received: from unknown (HELO tamouh) (hakmi@rogers.com@70.27.160.99 with login) by smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Aug 2006 00:37:55 -0000 From: "Tamouh H." To: "'User Freebsd'" , Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 20:38:01 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20060803180553.B6529@ganymede.hub.org> Thread-Index: Aca3RCQ4EnZ49Yx6Q+2ISbP1sA7tyAAGX/Lw X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Message-Id: <20060804003755.09A2143D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: RE: Stand up and be counted - BSDStats Project X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:37:58 -0000 > I've been doing some thinking on it this afternoon, and think=20 > I've figured out about the simpliest way of doing it ... it=20 > still doesn't deal with "fakers" and such, but, IMHO, I don't=20 > think that that is a *huge* problem that needs to be=20 > addressed ... some might do it for a lark, but, overall, it=20 > just sounds like something that is "more worth then its=20 > worth", so over time, it should eventually balance out ... >=20 Excellent idea, and will be one of first to register! I don't believe at = first it is that important to ensure no fake entries, it is more crucial = to get this project started at first then deal with the more troublesome = details.