From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 12 12:02:34 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA06537 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 12:02:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (root@mexico.brainstorm.eu.org [193.56.58.253]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA06526 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 12:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (brasil.brainstorm.eu.org [193.56.58.33]) by mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA02701 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 21:02:12 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (8.6.12/8.6.12) with UUCP id VAA18570 for hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 21:01:49 +0200 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.Alpha.7/keltia-uucp-2.9) id UAA02791; Mon, 12 Aug 1996 20:53:50 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <199608121853.UAA02791@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 20:53:50 +0200 From: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. NT Stability In-Reply-To: <199608121739.NAA16750@etinc.com>; from Dennis on Aug 12, 1996 13:39:31 -0400 References: <199608121739.NAA16750@etinc.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.39 Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Dennis: > 1) Its rather new... > 2) It was written by Microsoft Blind bashing will never make things progress. >From what I've heard, NT is probably the first thing ever written by Microsoft that can be called "Operating System" even if I don't agree with many architectural and protocol choices (but I'm partial to Unix). It has flaws and bugs but which OS doesn't ? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #17: Fri Aug 2 20:40:17 MET DST 1996