From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 8 17:51:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D670C16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 May 2004 17:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56DA243D48 for ; Sat, 8 May 2004 17:51:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roop.nanuwa@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 72so65144rnf for ; Sat, 08 May 2004 17:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.99.11 with SMTP id w11mr52841cwb; Sat, 08 May 2004 17:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <75f3f705040508175120dc669f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 17:51:24 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa To: Christopher Nehren In-Reply-To: <20040508203555.GA862@prophecy.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040508203555.GA862@prophecy.dyndns.org> cc: FreeBSD Questions List Subject: Re: the most light weight X web browser? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 00:51:25 -0000 On Sat, 8 May 2004 16:35:55 -0400, Christopher Nehren wrote: > > ... right. Opera is a kitchen sink suite just like Mozilla. > That, and it's the ugliest thing on the planet -- even worse than > anything Apple's ever released, IMO. > It is feature-packed, that's true. However, feature-packed and slow/bloated are not necessarily synonymous. It is blazing fast and low on requirements - what difference does it make if it has extraneous features? Those features aren't hampering anything one wants to accomplish if they don't make use of them. As for looks, Opera is skinable. If you don't like the look, there's nothing stopping you from choosing from hundreds of different skins. --roop