From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 22 07:21:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE98F7B5; Wed, 22 May 2013 07:21:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward4h.mail.yandex.net (forward4h.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f05::4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B38ED9; Wed, 22 May 2013 07:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (smtp4h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.186.21]) by forward4h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7F2841B21CC0; Wed, 22 May 2013 11:21:14 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id C9F4E2C0E73; Wed, 22 May 2013 11:21:13 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 93.91.2.193.tel.ru (93.91.2.193.tel.ru [93.91.2.193]) by smtp4h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id zpSChZicjP-LDoGKmgS; Wed, 22 May 2013 11:21:13 +0400 Message-ID: <519C71E9.30701@passap.ru> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 11:21:13 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov Organization: =?UTF-8?B?0JfQkNCeICLQktCQ0KDQoiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130517 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexey Dokuchaev Subject: Re: svn commit: r318592 - head/benchmarks/mdtest References: <201305201043.r4KAhCKv031239@svn.freebsd.org> <20130521023448.GA3541@FreeBSD.org> <519BA0B0.7010700@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <519BA0B0.7010700@passap.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 07:21:17 -0000 21.05.2013 06:34, Alexey Dokuchaev пишет: > I am also not convinced that using subshell is required. BTW, from /usr/src/UPDATING: ----- 20130516: [...] It is worth noting that bmake (like gmake) treats the command line as the unit of failure, rather than statements within the command line. Thus '(cd some/where && dosomething)' is safer than 'cd some/where; dosomething'. The '()' allows consistent behavior in parallel build. ----- -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve