From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Nov 27 16:53:26 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D941153DBE for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from admin.sibptus.ru (admin.sibptus.ru [IPv6:2001:19f0:5001:21dc::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30B985FC2 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sibptus.ru; s=20181118; h=In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=fWMaP7vE6Xd51dv8jFtQUPZx6g+pcIZSZg0XuA6fqe4=; b=UHjiDlz+tMINE1Y/IQrCw6Qpcm zBFVUINLFTGW2Uu9mA2t7jOBjLSzvnNvPvXUcavnRGKjgHhhgDxEpHqyO9SSsr6NSmxQuFEoWZhoJ CqN/XPM9l5M5T65NYk62k6RnL5aQdMxdKBXyScv9NbbULeRQ7GXuDFvGRW/PS/odS2/o=; Received: from vas by admin.sibptus.ru with local (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1gRgby-000MhE-Vr; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:53:22 +0700 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 23:53:22 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: "John R. Levine" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Invalid DKIM signatures in this list Message-ID: <20181127165322.GA87173@admin.sibptus.ru> References: <20181126125259.GB86999@admin.sibptus.ru> <20181126172133.CDCDB2008E6098@ary.qy> <20181127015856.GA79319@admin.sibptus.ru> <20181127160330.GC78157@admin.sibptus.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: Victor Sudakov X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F30B985FC2 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.27 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[sibptus.ru]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tomsk.su]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[sibptus.ru:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: admin.sibptus.ru]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.985,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.78)[ip: (-9.02), ipnet: 2001:19f0:5000::/38(-4.51), asn: 20473(-0.28), country: US(-0.09)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:2001:19f0:5000::/38, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:53:26 -0000 John R. Levine wrote: >On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Victor Sudakov wrote: >> With all due respect to you as the co-author of the RFC, it does say >> something about deleting old signatures. I'm not quoting for you (this would >> be odd) but for the general public here who are reading this thread. > >I know it does. Murray was guessing, and he guessed wrong. Which is proved where? Is RFC6377 obsolete now? >"BCP" at the IETF doesn't mean what it sounds like. Then, what is the BCP now, regarding DKIM and mailing lists? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/