From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 7 11:51:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C3716A4CE; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (xorpc.icir.org [192.150.187.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE7043D2D; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:51:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@icir.org) Received: from xorpc.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i37Iorgd017267; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:50:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@xorpc.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by xorpc.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.3/Submit) id i37IorGs017266; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:50:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 11:50:53 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20040407115053.A16602@xorpc.icir.org> References: <20040407105748.C13115@xorpc.icir.org> <20040407183843.GA960@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040407183843.GA960@ip.net.ua>; from ru@freebsd.org on Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 09:38:43PM +0300 cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arp entries for local interfaces disappearing ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 18:51:44 -0000 On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 09:38:43PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: ... > > ? (10.0.1.52) at 00:02:2d:08:a3:3b on rl0 [ethernet] > > ? (10.0.1.55) at 00:40:f4:34:b1:4b on rl0 permanent [ethernet] > > ? (10.0.1.64) at 52:54:05:de:99:7c on rl0 [ethernet] > > > > and it's marked permanent, so it should not expire! Yet it > > looks like they do anyways... > > > Here it doesn't disappear. Perhaps, you have some routing daemons i suspect you are not supposed to make statements before net.link.ether.inet.max_age seconds :) seriously though, i see this consistently on all 4.9 boxes around here... the parent route entries are still there, no routing daemons running, no ifconfig's issued... cheers luigi