From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 7 04:36:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF74E16A4CF for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 04:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hexagon.stack.nl (hexagon.stack.nl [131.155.140.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8768B43D45 for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 04:36:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by hexagon.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A784A517A; Fri, 7 May 2004 13:36:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 54E196484; Fri, 7 May 2004 13:36:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 13:36:54 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Marc Olzheim , Tim Robbins , Bruce M Simpson , Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040507113654.GA94118@stack.nl> References: <20040507092235.GA61837@stack.nl> <20040507100119.GA15782@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20040507105355.GA93808@stack.nl> <20040507112928.GA14419@isis.wad.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040507112928.GA14419@isis.wad.cz> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: Unified getcwd() implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 11:36:55 -0000 On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:29:28PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # marcolz@stack.nl / 2004-05-07 12:53:55 +0200: > > And yes, this is blatantly plagiarised, since most of the code came > > straight from compat/linux/linux_getcwd(). > > > > Why reinvent the wheel... > > FreeBSD doesn't need the legal division of FSF on its back. This is already in our source tree: /usr/src/sys/compat/linux/linux_getcwd.c Which contains only BSD license suff, plus a NetBSD and OpenBSD CVS id: /* $OpenBSD: linux_getcwd.c,v 1.2 2001/05/16 12:50:21 ho Exp $ */ /* $NetBSD: vfs_getcwd.c,v 1.3.2.3 1999/07/11 10:24:09 sommerfeld Exp $ */ What does this have to do with the FSF ? Marc