From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 7 04:38:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0255716A4D1 for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 04:38:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hexagon.stack.nl (hexagon.stack.nl [131.155.140.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDBA43D31 for ; Fri, 7 May 2004 04:38:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by hexagon.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049D0517A; Fri, 7 May 2004 13:38:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id AC8D46484; Fri, 7 May 2004 13:38:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 13:38:26 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Marc Olzheim , Tim Robbins , Bruce M Simpson , Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040507113826.GB94118@stack.nl> References: <20040507092235.GA61837@stack.nl> <20040507100119.GA15782@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20040507105355.GA93808@stack.nl> <20040507112928.GA14419@isis.wad.cz> <20040507113654.GA94118@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040507113654.GA94118@stack.nl> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: Unified getcwd() implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 11:38:27 -0000 On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 01:36:54PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > Which contains only BSD license suff, plus a NetBSD and OpenBSD CVS > id: > > /* $OpenBSD: linux_getcwd.c,v 1.2 2001/05/16 12:50:21 ho Exp $ */ > /* $NetBSD: vfs_getcwd.c,v 1.3.2.3 1999/07/11 10:24:09 sommerfeld Exp $ > */ > > What does this have to do with the FSF ? But I agree that the license header of vfs_cache.c should be merged with that of linux_getcwd.c, btw. Marc