From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 08:23:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E3E1065672; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 08:23:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5BD8FC1B; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 08:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from x220.ovitrap.com ([122.129.201.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q558N2kF018565; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 02:23:03 -0600 From: Erich To: Mark Linimon Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 15:23:01 +0700 Message-ID: <1544703.EkgB5WbdBi@x220.ovitrap.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.3 (Linux/3.3.7-1.fc16.x86_64; KDE/4.8.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20120605060950.GC32448@lonesome.com> References: <2188078.y2TVGRxzTH@x220.ovitrap.com> <20120605060950.GC32448@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mark Andrews , Chris Rees , "freebs @mail.isc.org>> Current FreeBSD" , "O. Hartmann" , Adam Strohl Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 08:23:26 -0000 Hi, On 05 June 2012 1:09:50 Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:00:45PM +0700, Erich wrote: > > All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), > > only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not > > branched. > > If you create a branch, you must create a tag for that branch. > > However, you can create a tag without creating a branch. That is what > is done for the ports tree. > > It's not particularly easy to see this on cvsweb. But let's take a look > at a random Mk/bsd.*.mk file via 'cvs log': here we are. I never found this. > > RCS file: /home/FreeBSD/pcvs/ports/Mk/bsd.apache.mk,v > Working file: bsd.apache.mk > head: 1.36 > branch: > locks: strict > access list: > symbolic names: > RELEASE_8_3_0: 1.35 > RELEASE_9_0_0: 1.33 > RELEASE_7_4_0: 1.26 > RELEASE_8_2_0: 1.26 > RELEASE_6_EOL: 1.26 > [...] > RELEASE_6_1_0: 1.9 > RELEASE_5_5_0: 1.9 If this list would make it into the documentation, all I asked would be already there. I could write this but my English will need some corrections. If you could give a link to how to do this properly, I would do it then. But is this true for apache only or for the whole ports tree? Erich