From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 07:13:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AADC16A54D for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:13:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bushman@rsu.ru) Received: from mail.r61.net (mail.r61.net [195.208.245.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E00143D53 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:13:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bushman@rsu.ru) Received: from carrera ([82.179.80.107]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.r61.net (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7M7CnEG080394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:12:52 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from bushman@rsu.ru) Message-ID: <002901c6c5ba$628b67d0$9800a8c0@carrera> From: "Michael Bushkov" To: "LI Xin" References: <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <44EAA213.6010507@delphij.net> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:12:40 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.2, clamav-milter version 0.88.2 on asterix.r61.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:13:12 -0000 Hi, Li Xin wrote: >Would you please consider having the imported OpenLDAP to install shared >objects under alternative names? It might be painful for users who >wants OpenLDAP installation from the ports collection (as OpenLDAP team >moves fast and fixes bug from time to time) if they get a same library >in /usr/lib... I've been thinking about that. Would names like "libldap_i.so" and "liblber_i.so" be ok ("_i" means "imported", or "internal")? With best regards, Michael Bushkov