From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May  7 05:41:04 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 166B116A502; Fri,  7 May 2004 05:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A9E5443D39; Fri,  7 May 2004 05:41:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nectar@celabo.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 37AF95485D; Fri,  7 May 2004 07:41:02 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gw.celabo.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (hellblazer.celabo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with SMTP id 59056-06; Fri,  7 May 2004 07:40:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lum.celabo.org (lum.celabo.org [10.0.1.107])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client CN "lum.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK))
	by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8032854846; Fri,  7 May 2004 07:40:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by lum.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id D46671FAFEF; Fri,  7 May 2004 07:40:43 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 07:40:43 -0500
From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
To: Martin Stiemerling <stiemerling@netlab.nec.de>
Message-ID: <20040507124043.GA1136@lum.celabo.org>
Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>,
	Martin Stiemerling <stiemerling@netlab.nec.de>,
	Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-net@freebsd.org
References: <200405061846.i46Ik3Jc060969@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<409A8EF3.5825EF0C@freebsd.org> <2147483647.1083923460@[10.1.1.109]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2147483647.1083923460@[10.1.1.109]>
X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Default behaviour of IP Options processing
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 12:41:04 -0000

On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
> Anyway, setting the default to reject packets is IMHO not 
> a good idea,

After a night's sleep, I also agree.  Emitting ICMP messages is
probably a bad, bad default.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org