From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 16:35:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8F316A4CE for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:35:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C158F43FEA for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:35:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (blackwater.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354172BD34 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:35:40 +1100 (EST) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 7760F511F9; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:05:38 +1030 (CST) Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 11:05:38 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Marcus Reid Message-ID: <20031122003538.GP32267@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20031121234212.GA91890@blazingdot.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kERJ49nCKmnv470N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031121234212.GA91890@blazingdot.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Vinum breakage - please update UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 00:35:42 -0000 --kERJ49nCKmnv470N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Friday, 21 November 2003 at 15:42:12 -0800, Marcus Reid wrote: > Hello, > > I just upgraded a -CURRENT box this afternoon to discover that vinum > is broken. If I hadn't done dumps of my working world beforehand I > would be in pretty sad shape. Should UPDATING make note of this > breakage? No. UPDATING is for things that will change relatively permanently. > It would have saved me some embarassment, and I'm sure others are > about to clobber their machines. As far as I can tell, this breakage doesn't harm the data. Others have reported that it works on older versions of CURRENT. I hope to have it fixed this weekend. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --kERJ49nCKmnv470N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/vq9aIubykFB6QiMRAqPkAJ9UcpDILuijkr6E+D2329VEuFkVRQCgmgZC Vh3fG0mMSaZrss3UUcXtHcU= =Y1EG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kERJ49nCKmnv470N--