From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 27 02:41:08 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A33616A417; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25ACE13C459; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot26.obsecurity.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440EB1A3C1A; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 19:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot26.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E5DDABBB1; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:41:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:41:07 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20070727024107.GA69300@rot26.obsecurity.org> References: <20070717131518.G1177@fledge.watson.org> <200707172342.39082.max@love2party.net> <20070720111539.U1096@fledge.watson.org> <46A100C2.1030606@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46A100C2.1030606@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Robert Watson , freebsd-pf@freebsd.org, Max Laier Subject: Re: Attention pf/ipfw users with uid/gid/jail rules (Re: Reminder: NET_NEEDS_GIANT, debug.mpsafenet going away in 7.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:41:08 -0000 On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:36:50AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > > > >On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Max Laier wrote: > > > >So far I have had 0 (zero) reports of problems since this thread began. > >Could people using uid/gid/jail rules with ipfw or pf on 7.x *please* > >try running their firewalls without debug.mpsafenet -- ignore the > >witness warnings and/or disable witness, and let us know if you > >experience deadlocks. We're reaching the very end of the merge cycle > >for 7.0, and I would really like to remove the Giant crutches (now > >effectively unused) from the network stack so it's not part of the > >ABI/API, the code is simplified and cleaned up, etc. > > > > does "problem" include a LOR message, or only a deadlock? > I've seen plenty of the first, but not the second. Various users have reported definite deadlocks relating to uid/gid firewall rules in the past. Kris