From owner-freebsd-current Sun Nov 8 22:57:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA18976 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 22:57:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net (porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net [206.64.4.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA18971 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 22:57:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA22061 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 1998 02:00:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) X-Authentication-Warning: porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net: bright owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 02:00:09 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: bright@porkfriedrice.ny.genx.net To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: newer gcc? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Has there been any thought to jumping to a newer version of gcc, specifically egcs? Also if one was to integrate egcs into the source tree what "stage" would be integrated? What i mean is that egcs does a whole bunch of odd things to get itself built, would only the last pass be done in freebsd'd build? or how far back in the build should the integrated source start? What i mean is definetly post-configure but before.... what? Alfred Perlstein - Programmer, HotJobs Inc. - www.hotjobs.com -- There are operating systems, and then there's FreeBSD. -- http://www.freebsd.org/ 3.0-current To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message