From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 27 10:08:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6904A1065675; Sun, 27 May 2012 10:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zeising@daemonic.se) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:17:f0a0::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83A68FC15; Sun, 27 May 2012 10:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3586A40006; Sun, 27 May 2012 12:07:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 295D440007; Sun, 27 May 2012 12:07:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bernadotte.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 Received: from mx.daemonic.se (h-45-105.a163.priv.bahnhof.se [94.254.45.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B195940006; Sun, 27 May 2012 12:07:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:0:1::6]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3W0cMc1mprz8ggv; Sun, 27 May 2012 12:07:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daemonic.se Received: from mx.daemonic.se ([10.1.0.3]) (using TLS with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA) by mailscanner.daemonic.se (mailscanner.daemonic.se [10.1.0.6]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTPS id 0Rr-CVhjN0CI; Sun, 27 May 2012 12:07:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.daemonic.se (mail.daemonic.se [10.1.0.4]) by mx.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3W0cMY66qVz8gh0; Sun, 27 May 2012 12:07:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::4] (vivi.daemonic.se [IPv6:2001:470:dca9:1::4]) by mail.daemonic.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3W0cMY3myZz9CvV; Sun, 27 May 2012 12:07:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FC1FCF9.4090305@daemonic.se> Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 12:07:53 +0200 From: Niclas Zeising User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Pinter References: <4FC1082A.9090801@acsalaska.net> <4FC112A1.7080600@acsalaska.net> <4FC128C6.1020902@acsalaska.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mel Flynn , x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libX11 and clang: compile error X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 10:08:00 -0000 On 2012-05-26 21:06, Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 5/26/12, Mel Flynn wrote: >> On 26-5-2012 20:40, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>> On 5/26/12, Mel Flynn wrote: >>>> On 26-5-2012 19:17, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>>>> I think src.conf is relevant, while it changes the system behavior, as >>>>> changed the default cc from gcc-4.2 to clang. >>>> >>>> Thinking it doesn't make it so. Run: >>>> grep _WITHOUT_SRCCONF /usr/share/mk/*.mk >>>> >>>> Then investigate. >>>> Setting CC in /etc/src.conf has *no effect on CC passed to the ports*. >>>> Really. It does not. >>>> The file that can do that is /etc/make.conf. >>>> Another way is setting CC in your environment variables, through >>>> /etc/login.conf, /etc/yourshellrc ~/.profile ~/.[cz]?shrc and what not. >>>> >>>> In order to debug your issue, you should provide the output of what make >>>> thinks CC and CPP are and backtrack where they are set. >>>> Start with: >>>> make -C /usr/ports/x11/libX11 -V CC -V CPP >>>> -- >>>> Mel >>>> >>> >>> After setting WITH_CLANG_IS_CC in src.conf the base system cc,cpp and >>> c++ has changed: >> >> See ports/166373. >> >> Also, the fact that your /usr/bin/cpp == clang-cpp is relevant! >> Especially if you report: >>> Somewhere in config* or Makefile are a hardcoded /usr/bin/cpp ... >> >> -- >> Mel >> > > this is a workaround, see the attached file This is a known issue and is being looked into. The issue is that clang cpp and gcc cpp behaves differently wrt. -traditional. We will try to find a general approach that works for all xorg ports that use cpp -traditional, probably regardless of the regular compiler used. Regards! -- Niclas Zeising