From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 7 18:34:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 470F64AB; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 18:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from biertje.skysmurf.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:980:27fb:1:21b:78ff:fea8:3f22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB528233E; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 18:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from biertje.skysmurf.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by biertje.skysmurf.nl (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s67IY6LS052938; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:34:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fonz@biertje.skysmurf.nl) Received: (from fonz@localhost) by biertje.skysmurf.nl (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s67IY6PN052937; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:34:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fonz) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 20:34:06 +0200 From: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" To: FreeBSD ports mailing list Subject: [Portlint] Staging warning Message-ID: <20140707183406.GA52895@biertje.skysmurf.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: marcus@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 18:34:09 -0000 --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [CC: Portlint maintainer] Presently, running Portlint on an unstaged port results in a *warning* that says "Consider adding STAGE support". I'd surmise that a fatal error along the lines of "STAGE support will be mandatory pretty damn soon" would be more appropriate. Just a thought, AvW --=20 Imbibo, ergo sum. --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTuugdAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8QIYP/3fRWRx07q6ZN8InDo3z8IVt z13NuYUynKUiw0UnQbvX0qyxA8zYNB6FYoOxouRwuMcR86DIEe+st126u4nCHgNZ WV+xXOZoKMF+waACWjj7lGfAepqPw2CjS9MxNxTvlWXANQPsb4iZqVTt1RVW3cq7 sKM5AyfOnNxODback8X8M4rfPzn0j9eTy7tEn1cjdM+48AhdgEEvUO4SfqA6QBnK caivZyvW5He50htZyHiMZfa84Ahm8Z4LBS9rTr/S+Q+pp6bQ70HVDA2qHdvyBkIX GZT+U7KBmy0IFlMzfEd5/r7fVXVWVpx8Vbdde6J0V2LNPTqEsB9cnM7/6+JvhQxB jvcZtZ2kmkC6XTXKwN8wLzEjl4GiukMUGOSyxf+0zpwl5mfre+Ylv+U2sdwd1bo3 1lXbnvd/GpACHRUVhSDyar+WyqVe2mz6xXYoDeGpy2qDxl0NTh5nCMrF8UifxUjU hVvvy7tIUTT0BpxXWj4CTFTG7o34FWIPLW/M69eeVO9qiHYO5aVtAJqAgX/FXxZg EhejUNsz9qOxDJT1CeE+7YgLoCLXOErT4w49nhZiDD4nj5aJT/mq7UdzgavElc5U SrP4bi4PzpommLcOGwwlwA/h+O7XjL3ywPMH4lREpTebB3cVyT5p+XdkFOwRymfW GBkaPCjwvkkQ2gCT0SL6 =HluT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--