From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 12:35:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BE216A481 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D5413C46A for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:35:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080692C50CA2; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:35:12 +0300 (EEST) Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:34:53 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: "TooMany Secrets" Message-ID: <20070617153453.47eac2f1@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_.sG5NNJKeUGKP++0CwGSdb/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to make a make install without questions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:35:14 -0000 --Sig_.sG5NNJKeUGKP++0CwGSdb/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 12:10:29 +0200 "TooMany Secrets" wrote: > Hi! >=20 > Excuse me if this is a estupid question, but in six years with > FreeBSD, today I haven't still an answer to this: > - If I make a "make install clean", in a port like "x11/kde3", are > there any way to make the lack of questions? Or maybe better, are > there any way to make anything like "make -y (or -Y for YES options) > install clean"? >=20 > The trouble is ports like KDE, with platform independency (more or > less cpu power), take more time because you need to stay (more or > less) in front of computer to choose and accept the port options. > I understand that you don't need this with other ports (like apache, > php, etc), for obvious reasons. But I think that with ports like > gnome2 or kde3, maybe I believe that it would be a great saving of > time. >=20 > Sorry if the question is understandable for my bad english. `make config-recursive` in the port's directory will help, except for ports that choose not to implement OPTIONS but their own custom script (poking their maintainers might be a .. useful idea). --=20 IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" --Sig_.sG5NNJKeUGKP++0CwGSdb/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGdSp/BX6fi0k6KXsRAonkAJ9a4SvAUckofqu/GTs0xynb9J0WHACgshRU WQvUtC/kgpyheIHx+0RBJCA= =W+Xb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_.sG5NNJKeUGKP++0CwGSdb/--