From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 19 02:22:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF94106566B; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3C28FC14; Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.156] (adsl-19-214-182.bna.bellsouth.net [68.19.214.182]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2J2LWjt075698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:21:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Greg Rivers In-Reply-To: References: <1231599679.1837.13.camel@wombat.2hip.net> <1237318671.1728.7.camel@balrog.2hip.net> <1237395643.1738.3.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HPmBHnDu/Ot5vghDK2if" Organization: FreeBSD Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 21:22:37 -0500 Message-Id: <1237429357.1738.61.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: freebsd-x11 , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] drm merged to -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 02:22:55 -0000 --=-HPmBHnDu/Ot5vghDK2if Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 18:18 -0500, Greg Rivers wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Robert Noland wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 18:24 -0500, Greg Rivers wrote: > >> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Robert Noland wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 12:20 -0500, Greg Rivers wrote: > >>>> On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Robert Noland wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I just merged drm (Direct Rendering) from HEAD. > >>>>> > >>>>> - Support for latest Intel chips > >>>>> - Support and fixes for many AMD/ATI chips r500 and below > >>>>> - Support AMD/ATI IGP based chips (rs690/rs485) > >>>>> - Lots of code cleanups > >>>>> - Lots of other fixes and changes since the existing drm > >>>>> is 2+ years old > >>>>> > >>>>> If you are experiencing a "garbled" screen with certain pci/pci-e b= ased > >>>>> radeons, I have another patch in HEAD that isn't included yet. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I have a workstation with a [Radeon X600 (PCIE)] card. The X displa= y has > >>>> been garbled since these DRM updates went in in January, and remains > >>>> garbled with 7.1-STABLE as of yesterday. As a work-around, I'm runn= ing > >>>> the up-to-date 7.1-STABLE system (both world and ports) with a > >>>> 7.1-RELEASE-p2 kernel. The display is fine with the old kernel and = X > >>>> works great; I even see dramatically improved performance with the n= ew > >>>> Xorg and EXA acceleration. Your work is much appreciated. > >>>> > >>>> But the garbled display with the recent DRM still plagues me. > >>>> > >>>> [snip] > >>> > >>> Could you try the attached patch. > >>> > >> > >> Unfortunately, there is no noticeable difference with this patch. > >> > >> > >>> Also, I'm guessing that this is a PCI based card, right? Also, it is= n't > >>> an integrated model? > >>> > >> > >> Yes, this is a PCIEx16 card in a HP Compaq dc7600 desktop PC, not a > >> motherboard integrated adapter. > >> > >> Thanks for your help. I'm willing to spend some time debugging this; > >> please let me know if there's more information I can provide or other > >> tests or patches I can try. > > > > Ok, try this patch... I asked the folks from AMD and they agree that > > this shouldn't be needed on an RV370, but we will give it a try... This > > is what fixed the garbled display on the IGP chips. > > >=20 > The display is still garbled with this patch too. >=20 > I'm curious about why the drm driver calls this card a RV370, while pcico= nf > and the X server call it a RV380: > pciconf: "RV380 RADEON X600 Series 265MB" I'm not sure where pciconf gets it's data. I would actaully like to look at that. > X server: "ATI Technologies Inc RV380 [Radeon X600 (PCIE)]" This comes from /usr/local/share/pciids/pci.ids > drm driver: "ATI Radeon RV370 X600 Pro" This comes from drm's own internal tables. (drm_pciids.h) > Could it be that the drm driver has the wrong chip set or configuration f= or > this PCI ID? I don't think so, all of those should be about the same. Ok, so it isn't the gart caching... Can you get me a pointer to a screenshot? What is garbled exactly? Is the damage constrained to specific windows or it it the entire framebuffer? robert. > --=20 > Greg Rivers --=20 Robert Noland FreeBSD --=-HPmBHnDu/Ot5vghDK2if Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAknBrG0ACgkQM4TrQ4qfROOB2wCdHl8XH7WhTvjr3O/ANtQlLm4D cEEAni3hJQfYp4afY2RLoFaB6V1FgvzR =DGlm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HPmBHnDu/Ot5vghDK2if--