From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 5 21:50:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F86710656B0 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 21:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C8A8FC1C for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 21:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o85Lo2nT047952 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 21:50:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o85Lo2LL047950; Sun, 5 Sep 2010 21:50:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 21:50:02 GMT Message-Id: <201009052150.o85Lo2LL047950@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Doug Barton Cc: Subject: Re: ports/150235: sysutils/smartmontools build system bug X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Doug Barton List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:50:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/150235; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Doug Barton To: Alex Samorukov Cc: Garrett Wollman , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, developers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/150235: sysutils/smartmontools build system bug Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 14:44:22 -0700 On 09/05/2010 12:28 PM, Alex Samorukov wrote: > Your proposed patch will break smartmontools functionality - thats why > i`m not able to accept it. It's not at all clear to me why developers@ is cc'ed on these messages, but since we are ... Alex, Can you please explain why the change Garrett is suggesting will break anything? According to his PR all the headers that smartmontools needs are included in /usr/include. Is that not the case? What you've been told (that we prefer not to have userland tools include /usr/src directly) is accurate, so the burden of proof is on you to explain why it's necessary in this case. The fact that other ports may or may not do this is not relevant here. hth, Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso