From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 28 22:24:46 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0982F16A4B3
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1C04402B
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from smtp.des.no (37.80-203-228.nextgentel.com [80.203.228.37])
	by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4F8847D161; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:24:43 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id EAD569C8D6; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:24:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dwp.des.no (dwp.des.no [10.0.0.4])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id E6E8A9C8D5; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:24:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id 9C40DB84A; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:24:38 +0200 (CEST)
To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
References: <xzpisndgqk1.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<Pine.LNX.4.53.0309271138260.459@a.shell.peak.org>
	<2493.67.85.96.168.1064692382.squirrel@www.wingfoot.org>
	<a06001a05bb9ba8d12cb8@[10.0.1.4]> <xzpisndgqk1.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<5.0.2.1.1.20030929053024.02ce0008@popserver.sfu.ca>
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:24:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.1.20030929053024.02ce0008@popserver.sfu.ca> (Colin
 Percival's message of "Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:34:56 +0100")
Message-ID: <xzpeky0goa1.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=8.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
cc: Glenn Sieb <ges@wingfoot.org>
cc: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What are people using for MUA's nowadays?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Non technical items related to the community
	<freebsd-chat.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat>,
	<mailto:freebsd-chat-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:24:46 -0000

Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> writes:
>    International standards, such as the RFCs?  Every text-protocol RFC
> I've seen has been pretty clear about requiring CRLF pairs.

RFCs are not Unix-specific.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no