From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 27 06:19:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F280A106567C for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:19:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepherosa@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF2F8FC2D for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:19:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepherosa@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 2so643814ywt.13 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:19:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pZIJg+sPeKP3MZB24GDj2XT6hnIwkkQ2mv1XCjBC77Q=; b=ajrMQg7K6z6Zgf8fi+K2EYtkcMbFo8C3+arK7ADGi7sTv5jrGTS4ucP3MnB4ugWA4s v+UWwmWhVmYTw0y4IDkT9VixCdh2RIyoPBk8e6sj7YNWOFdtCb2dm8f6VK3i5eb1BSMp +Xg5XsVyCZZYeB4UaNsqTh2WCx1OltxhYPrgo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=TgL+2xCInh4AbRjzs53raGloj7Xp44KzvEWrqNHcEwpE0daVsnW+JjVS1o1/5K/3N3 U2DNLgJM+6r2Vt6moEricfaBWwnwZHLJriMYCXNXb1pdlyJXFuvyQF89hqzol9anKMj8 1aBXO30Z55pXkTnjc6yu49Nc0/2wFtN3sF1FE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.157.1 with SMTP id j1mr3320905ybo.83.1235714165821; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:56:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20090225075310.GA85904@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:56:05 +0800 Message-ID: From: Sepherosa Ziehau To: Ivan Voras Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Questions on processing smaller frame size X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:19:57 -0000 On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > > There is a very experimental patch to the em driver, not endorsed by the > em driver author (for unknown reasons) that some users claim helps with > SMP performance. See > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-December/020441.html > What's the interrupt rate of the above driver if you do: netperf -H remote-ip -t UDP_STREAM -l 60 -- -m 1472 Anyone has tried it? Best Regards, sephe -- Live Free or Die