From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  9 11:39:27 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0604937B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  9 Jul 2003 11:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu (GS166.SP.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.205.169])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5404B43FA3
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed,  9 Jul 2003 11:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dpelleg@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu)
Sender: dpelleg@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu
To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
References: <20030708200104.GA66624@cnt.org> <3F0B2AAE.5080708@mac.com>
	<20030708210511.GF66624@cnt.org>	<3F0B3526.8050903@mac.com>
From: Dan Pelleg <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org>
Date: 09 Jul 2003 14:39:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3F0B3526.8050903@mac.com>
Message-ID: <u2sn0fnee9f.fsf@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Lines: 24
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: Paul Smith <paul@cnt.org>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Hardening production servers
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 18:39:27 -0000

Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> writes:

> Paul Smith wrote:
> [ ... ]
> > Is there a way to take advantage of the portupgrade suite when it comes to
> > building packages? I.e., is there a "make package" equivalent in portupgrade?
> > I would imagine portupgrade would make packages of any dependicies as well,
> > no?
> 
> Exactly; use the "-p" option to portupgrade:
> 
>       -p
>       --package              Build a package when each specified port is
>                              installed or upgraded.  If a package is upgraded
>                              and its dependent packages are given from the com-
>                              mand line (including the case where -r is speci-
>                              fied), build packages for them as well.


...and on the installing side, use -PP.

-- 

  Dan Pelleg