From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 11 00:32:04 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 96DCD16A4CE; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:32:04 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 25CD043D3F; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:32:04 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1B0U4lS075436;
	Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:30:04 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:30:03 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20050210.173003.37239701.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: des@des.no
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <86sm44nez7.fsf@xps.des.no>
References: <200502102331.j1ANVRQP026186@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<86sm44nez7.fsf@xps.des.no>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/ed if_ed.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 00:32:04 -0000

In message: <86sm44nez7.fsf@xps.des.no>
            des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes:
: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: >   Log:
: >   use
: >           while (complicated-expr)
: >                   continune;
: >   in preference to
: >           while (complicated-expr);
: =

: As a matter of taste, I prefer /* nothing */ to continue in cases lik=
e
: this.

Can we please not make every single one of these into a bikeshed?

I purposely chose continue because it is the simplest way to tell the
compiler that you didn't forget anything that's independent of
whitespace and comment folding.

Warner