From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 28 11:15:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22521065797 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 11:15:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f212.google.com (mail-ew0-f212.google.com [209.85.219.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8B68FC0A for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 11:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@googlemail.com) Received: by ewy8 with SMTP id 8so1765143ewy.43 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:15:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XTpA10yXAe96FUmwazS7rPT9snCHMYnpt+hQxRBBOY8=; b=rgn7dv/Jbb9XnkfuErF6q31l7GohzwRoS26aQVfhH0rbf7NGmul2MlbgIA5gGn9XA6 VvxIX5E8a2l8h9wB0MW373t4Jwp3EsnALKovgyTF3Rkr4+LuitM5umLAxRGjNBp3yht8 tafoTeOqc97N4jNQsD3VSNnozqfKxhzKvYxWY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZXgVXJz4xWh9+7bm4BhlONSr38v8oHiPAgJWWWe9to6pxgfyTDNWlM9AbRW7Ry50OF cm/QhFP9+28UNeNA15S4jNRIeTcXud6/Xr6eCr6k/m19qxuiDNW9ZZ6jp75bxEjT5r6z 4yd03ezSbMkyptdEu1ynXp+uCV39i9UH12UP0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.47.196 with SMTP id t46mr454566web.121.1243509342139; Thu, 28 May 2009 04:15:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <200905281030.n4SAUXdA046386@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <200905281041.n4SAfTHw046546@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:15:22 +0100 Message-ID: To: Wojciech Puchar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Olivier Nicole , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remotely edit user disk quota X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 11:15:44 -0000 2009/5/28 Wojciech Puchar : >> Due to these serious problems rlogin was rarely used across untrusted >> networks > > Good you finally pointed out the most important thing > > "rlogin/rsh is insecure across untrusted network" > > This is QUITE a difference between this and "rsh is insecure. period" > > rsh is as secure as the communication channel. If it can be considered > secure - DO USE rsh, because it's fastest as it doesn't have any encryption > overhead. > > > But the encryption overhead is almost nothing. The best security comes in layers. Also, I think it's a bad idea to leave money lying round like that. That's why we have banks. More layers. Chris -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in a mailing list?