From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 14 12:48:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A3D16A4CE for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 12:48:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gundel.de.clara.net (gundel.de.clara.net [212.82.225.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643AF43D1F for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 12:48:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jesk@killall.org) Received: from port-212-202-52-250.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.52.250] helo=turbofresse) by gundel.de.clara.net with smtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1CTK0L-000KoC-RY; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 14:01:17 +0100 Message-ID: <002d01c4ca48$3312e970$45fea8c0@turbofresse> From: "jesk" To: "Justin Hopper" References: <1099935987.4899.1730.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <001701c4c69e$1e81c510$45fea8c0@turbofresse> <20041109221544.3815fd48.thib@mi.is> <200411101101.32258.michael.riexinger@de.clara.net> <20041113080807.GJ1807@suricate.otoh.org> <009701c4c9c6$fc9c5d30$45fea8c0@turbofresse> <1100388569.5412.252.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:48:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mysql - Linuxthreads : Still needed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 12:48:18 -0000 > This is unfortunate, since 4.1.7 is the recommended release from MySQL > AB. Does anyone know why 4.0 is faster, or is it only faster in some > cases (anybody have any benchmarks?) ? > > 50% is quite a large margin and I'm sure most people, myself included, > are looking for maximum performance. I cant repeat my tests to show you topically benchmark results at the moment. But why dont you find out how it performance in your own conditions and then share your experiences with us?