From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Apr  8 22:14:59 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA02301
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 22:14:59 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id WAA02292
          ; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 22:14:57 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.cdrom.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami |
    =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?=
    =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=)
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Ports' Makefiles / package names 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 08 Apr 95 18:44:53 PDT."
             <199504090144.SAA03452@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> 
Date: Sat, 08 Apr 1995 22:14:56 -0700
Message-ID: <2291.797404496@freefall.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> This is a very good point.  Which way should we go?  I prefer letting
> the user add it explicitly, but you are the one who came up with these 
> two variables....Jordan?

I prefer it to be implicit, since I can't think of any circumstances
in which you _wouldn't_ want the catagory to index the project in a
keyword search, but you're the portsmeister now - it's ultimately your
decision.  I will abide by whatever solution you come to..

						Jordan