From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Mar 12 6:13:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from filk.iinet.net.au (syncopation-dns.iinet.net.au [203.59.24.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30C0537B718 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 06:13:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: (qmail 28819 invoked by uid 666); 12 Mar 2001 14:14:15 -0000 Received: from i003-015.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO elischer.org) (203.59.3.15) by mail.m.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 14:14:15 -0000 Message-ID: <3AACD955.28229D4C@elischer.org> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 06:12:37 -0800 From: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josef Karthauser Cc: The Babbler , John Sellens , emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware networking - really sysmouse complaints References: <200103112208.f2BM88L85365@gc0.generalconcepts.com> <20010311221123.B1541@tao.org.uk> <3AABF9DF.5E3C6E1F@babbleon.org> <20010311222703.C1541@tao.org.uk> <3AAC221F.1731699F@elischer.org> <20010312092438.B1402@tao.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Josef Karthauser wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 05:10:55PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > I don't know if you're using bridging or not... I've had problem today > > > with vmware and bridging and it was because the external interface (aue0 > > > in my case) wasn't in promiscious mode for some reason! I managed to > > > fake it by running a 'tcpdump -i aue0' in the background. I'm sure > > > there's an easier way to put the interface into promiscious mode. I'm > > > not sure what it is though. > > > > ngctl msg aue0: setpromisc 1 > > Magic ;) In my case it looks like the aue0 wasn't coming up before the > rc.d/vmware.sh script was setting up the netgraph bits. That's fixed > now but it's certainly good to know this. > > BTW, a number of times I've wanted to back the netgraph config out so I > assumed that I could do an 'ngctl rmhook nodename' where the nodenames > come from 'ngctl list'. Although the command doesn't complain it > doesn't remove the node though. I'm slightly baffled. What's the > official way? ngctl shutdown 'xyz0:' rmnode takes a node name AND a hook name. It just undoes the hook and will only act to remove the node if it was the last hook. > > Joe > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature -- __--_|\ Julian Elischer / \ julian@elischer.org ( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001 ---> X_.---._/ v To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message