From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 27 18:20:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC2916A4E7 for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from mail.stovebolt.com (mail.stovebolt.com [66.221.101.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0223343D6A for ; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:20:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.102] (adsl-65-69-141-107.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [65.69.141.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.stovebolt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE242114327; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:15:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:19:59 -0500 From: pauls@utdallas.edu To: Nikolas Britton , Atom Powers Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20060826223927.I82634@hub.org> <20060827020210.GA9218@zloy.stilyagin.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.5 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========62557ED73F28F8C5645D==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Darrin Chandler , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: BSDstats: Just added - Vendor Stats X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:20:23 -0000 --==========62557ED73F28F8C5645D========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On August 27, 2006 12:08:55 AM -0500 Nikolas Britton=20 wrote: > > What I think is interesting is the only ~50% uptake of FreeBSD/amd64 > on 64-bit x86 capable systems. FreeBSD/i386 takes ~90% of the pie. > Also the less then 1% uptake of sparc64 and alpha ports and 0% for > FreeBSD/PPC. Maybe we should can some of these platform ports, how > much overhead do they add to the project? > I don't think you have nearly enough systems inventoried to make decisions = like that. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========62557ED73F28F8C5645D==========--