From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 21:33:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A361EABFD for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:33:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mrJL4D4Fz4WCs for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:33:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c8b4f9d8; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:33:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id de23159f; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:33:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id d60fd60e; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:33:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 24725e9e (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:33:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:32:59 -0500 From: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Polytropon Subject: Re: vt console Message-ID: <20191230163259.56ad0807@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <20191230182209.f469e54e.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20191230120558.02ca91fb@dismail.de> <20191230182209.f469e54e.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mrJL4D4Fz4WCs X-Spamd-Bar: ------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.89 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; IP_SCORE(-2.19)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 78.46.0.0/15(0.54), asn: 24940(-1.54), country: DE(-0.02)]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[134.223.46.78.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:33:08 -0000 On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:22:09 +0100 Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 12:05:58 -0500, ajtiM via freebsd-questions wrote: > > Today I did read https://wiki.freebsd.org/Newcons and there are not > > any changes for " Screen saver Unstarted" > >=20 > > Changes on the site are made I think in 2015. Do they plan or is it > > impossible to make "green saver" to works, please? >=20 > Forget about vt. If your system runs X, use X (and a screensaver > for X), as X forces you to use vt. If it does _not_ run X, switch > to sc and use the sc-based screensaver as it worked for decades. > I've been following this suggestion for some time now, and it > saves you lots of trouble and disappointment. :-/ >=20 >=20 >=20 Thank you. I didn't try sc because I have efi boot (on Apple) and I thought that doesn't work anymore. I will get a try. --=20 =E2=80=9Cgood people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws=E2=80=9D=20 Plato