From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 28 12:03:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88FB10656AC for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20ACF8FC14 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 12:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so1261801fga.12 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 05:03:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mcDQE7xelrBEpxpVfceik8BrGc3F7Q7pxLEE2UNpWTw=; b=xwMGP9R1NtkXCtR8JcUVieVFzXL8pXTtSD43fbOvpT3fR3fBh5ArjqMGn1GY/2L1Xv w8AcoGo8y+WIKMr7vx22GXhm3jlKwGtZnipRMtiRORlIdio6kf0acxaV+3Gcjb43/lCD OWULgu6B5Ws32mCH3T5GU+BSu6UibxQj72dm8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K4ZD31eJhg4kW5g9o054FCO7h8FKzusmyMAmMi6wEOhKFiybLoVx0HB67F1cnrHLug WuHb7fTr4OeozzQfLjjBGKa6nxqHFOjydrNw0bZQcrIVzkPBc0UNklIVgMZk4eMTyuQc sFE3syHEulSlhhmxC3V3IfVvjY3lIxyn3dR1o= Received: by 10.86.49.13 with SMTP id w13mr1438232fgw.31.1243512189902; Thu, 28 May 2009 05:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm18617322fgg.3.2009.05.28.05.03.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 28 May 2009 05:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:03:06 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090528130306.2389ff89@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20090528122430.729c83a9@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20090527224351.1e94029b@bobcat.edu> <20090527205610.GA22384@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20090528021346.54c91917@gumby.homeunix.com> <200905280749.12509.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> <20090528122430.729c83a9@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: removing distfiles? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:03:23 -0000 On Thu, 28 May 2009 12:24:30 +0100 RW wrote: > On Thu, 28 May 2009 07:49:12 +0200 > Mel Flynn wrote: > > > On Thursday 28 May 2009 03:13:46 RW wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 May 2009 22:56:10 +0200 > > > > > > Roland Smith wrote: > > > > Using e.g. 'portmaster --clean-distfiles-all' only removes those > > > > distfiles that do not belong to installed ports. > > > > > > I've not used it myself, but there is also a shell script called > > > distviper in bsdadminscripts which supports both of distclean's > > > modes without the ruby dependence. > > > > What ruby dependence in portmaster? He said portMASTER not > > portUPGRADE. > > I wrote: "supports both of distclean's modes without the ruby > dependence". > > Portmaster only supports one of the modes, distclean has a ruby > dependence. Sorry, that should have been portsclean not distclean.