From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 21 14:11:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF9116A412 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720FD43D4C for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:11:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.internal (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49877DA9696 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:11:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.internal ([10.202.2.161]) by frontend3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:11:26 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 0x37EnXdQCNE4c4+lO5Pd+35MbfGQ9F7duTk/UdF+D7t 1158847885 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1B2EB43 for ; Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:11:25 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:11:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <4511E5E6.2020504@averageadmins.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20060920234610.06492910@209.152.117.178> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609211511.10829.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: How "real time" is FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 14:11:26 -0000 On Thursday 21 September 2006 06:12, Walt Pawley wrote: > At 11:47 PM -0500 9/20/06, W. D. wrote: > >Just reading this about Linux on ZDNet and was wondering: > > >nn> > > Cybernetic floobydust, IMHO. If you read what the banker says: " for each thousandth of a second that its trading software can act faster than competitors' software, the company would see $100 million a year in new revenue." It seems to me that they are really misunderstanding the problem. What they need is a system that's fast most of the time, rather than one that meets an arbitary deadline all the time. In other words they need a fast system, not a realtime system.