From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 19:05:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BDCB16A41F; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:05:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@freebsd.org) Received: from caelis.elvandar.org (caelis.elvandar.org [217.148.169.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983C043D5C; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:05:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (caelis.elvandar.org [217.148.169.59]) by caelis.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582B9358C53; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from caelis.elvandar.org ([217.148.169.59]) by localhost (caelis.elvandar.org [217.148.169.59]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13024-08; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:05:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.0.2.125] (home.evilcoder.org [195.64.94.120]) by caelis.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D38358C52; Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:05:03 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4314AE1F.7000706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:06:07 +0200 From: Remko Lodder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Macintosh/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pav@FreeBSD.org References: <1125401964.4959.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <1125401964.4959.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by the elvandar.org maildomain Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: abandoning jade X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: remko@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 19:05:07 -0000 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Hey folks, > > ceri suggested I bring this question to the wider auditorium: > > Why we do still stick with jade, when better faster happier openjade is > available? If it's purely historical sentiment, isn't it time for a > global switch to openjade? > Not sure why we stick with them, but i am in favor of well supported and good software, if that is openjade, go for it :) -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder ** remko@elvandar.org FreeBSD ** remko@FreeBSD.org Reporter DSINET ** remko@DSINet.org