From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 27 01:37:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6322AC9B for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BFAFD9 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1R1bMSu049618; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:37:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) with ESMTP id r1R1bMqV049615; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:37:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:37:22 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: FreeBSD port for redirecting printer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20130226180645.GA1161@tiny.Sisis.de> <20130226183646.GA2351@tiny.Sisis.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:37:22 -0700 (MST) Cc: Wojciech Puchar , Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 01:37:23 -0000 On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Wojciech Puchar < > wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > >> at all cost. >>>> >>> >>> But for this, CUPS is your best choice. >>> >> >> Sorry i DO WANT SIMPLE THINGS. not overcomplex windows style craps. thanks >> > > Prining is NOT simple no matter what you might think. And what CUPS (Common > UniX Print System) has to do with windows, I can't imagine. (It does share > quite a bit with MacOS and Apple does own a lot of the code.) > > Unless you want to print to a very dumb printer, CUPS is almost certainly > the simplest choice...vastly simpler than plain old lpd(8) and old, > unmanageable printcaps(5) files. But it's your life and your system. Huh. My experience has been the opposite. CUPS is a huge blob of complexity hiding behind a user interface that appears simple. lpd(8) can be annoying, but works fine for this kind of use.