From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 16:44:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED86106570E for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forwards4.yandex.ru (forwards4.yandex.ru [77.88.32.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759198FC1C for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:44:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from smtp14.yandex.ru (smtp14.yandex.ru [77.88.32.84]) by forwards4.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id B1C394C5599; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:44:36 +0300 (MSK) Received: from 213-120-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net ([94.179.120.213]:3079 "EHLO HOMEUSER" smtp-auth: "kes-kes" TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by mail.yandex.ru with ESMTP id S393337AbZA2Qoe (ORCPT + 1 other); Thu, 29 Jan 2009 19:44:34 +0300 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 X-Yandex-Front: smtp14 X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1233247474 X-BornDate: 1149541200 X-Yandex-Karma: 0 X-Yandex-KarmaStatus: 0 X-MsgDayCount: 9 X-Comment: RFC 2476 MSA function at smtp14.yandex.ru logged sender identity as: kes-kes Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:44:32 +0200 From: KES X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: SaftTen X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <47281477.20090129184432@yandex.ru> To: KES In-Reply-To: <14510195100.20090127212357@yandex.ru> References: <1292888884.20090127013434@yandex.ru> <79E49174-F6EC-4E97-AB7F-BCE05303A749@mac.com> <14510195100.20090127212357@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[3]: Can not set up two ADSL link to provider X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: KES List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:44:39 -0000 Здравствуйте, KES. Вы писали 27 января 2009 г., 21:23:57: K> Здравствуйте, Chuck. K> Вы писали 27 января 2009 г., 1:57:10: CS>> On Jan 26, 2009, at 3:34 PM, KES wrote: >>> I can not setup two ADSL PPPoE Links to same provider. >>> Because of imposibility to setup route for second connection >>> First connection gets: >>> ng0: flags=88d1 >>> metric 0 mtu 1492 >>> inet 92.113.94.215 --> 195.5.5.203 netmask 0xffffffff >>> >>> Second can not be established because of: >>> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Add address >>> 92.113.94.249/32->195.5.5.203 to ng1 >>> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Adding IPv4 address to ng1 >>> failed: File exists CS>> You should talk to your network provider and ask them whether they CS>> want you to do multilink PPP or IEEE 802.3ad link aggregation. Either CS>> way, the bonding of the two connections should give you a single CS>> virtual network interface (tunX for the first, probably, and laggX in CS>> the second case) which has only a single route. CS>> For example: CS>> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose80/swconfig-physical/html/ethernet-config14.html CS>> ...talks about "After you configure the LAG bundle, you can route IP CS>> traffic over it, create a VLAN over it, or route PPPoE traffic over it." K> I do not want to aggregate links. I want use them as standalone K> I had two servers, two lans and two ADSLs. Now I have one server, four K> NICs: first LAN1, second LAN2, third ADSL1, forth ADSL2 K> I want to route LAN1 through ADSL1, LAN2 through ADSL2. LAN1/LAN2 must K> not interact with each other. For each LAN I use its own FIB (routing K> table). K> Only one problem: I can not run setup two PPPoE link if for second K> link is leased same gateway as for first K> So, is it possible to workaround this problem? In any case I is impossible to talk to my provider. It will change nothing. This is country wide provider. They said: "if you can not configure that on one machine then you must use two.. ((((" Also NOTICE: when I setup second PPPoE connection I setfib 1 (second routing table). So route must be added to second routing table and must not conflict with first, but it does -- С уважением, KES mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru