From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May  2 18:03:07 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C11B16A675
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 May 2006 18:03:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mikej@rogers.com)
Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com
	[206.190.36.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB05943D58
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 May 2006 18:03:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mikej@rogers.com)
Received: (qmail 77061 invoked from network); 2 May 2006 18:03:06 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com;
	h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
	b=qCIuiFgcYcpPWkLkynem7QZFcgLvFpmy4F9YNhXA3ZKxyFYskqymLbQsiT+PxfYZuQmJtOwd+XLl6nHmvm9vf3jHZQseL7ORYTwgeIX6tbmLpEwTCJHrZkuilnUHbWOToC1wNzCMNiaKhxzDgeoDiYmFmukZzzVzqlo1YsaeDGY=
	; 
Received: from unknown (HELO ?70.31.50.218?) (mikej@rogers.com@70.31.50.218
	with plain)
	by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 May 2006 18:03:06 -0000
Message-ID: <44579EE1.6010300@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 14:03:13 -0400
From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@freebsd.org
References: <20060502171853.GG753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com>	<20060502172225.GA90840@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20060502174429.GH753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060502174429.GH753@dimma.mow.oilspace.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: Re: quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 May 2006 18:03:09 -0000

Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:22:26PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>   
>>> I think it's same problem as in thread "fsck_ufs locked in snaplk".
>>> Is this problem fixed in fresh 6.1-PRE?
>>>       
>> I think we've reproduced the problem, but it probably won't be fixed
>> before the release.  Sorry, the bug reports came too late in the
>> release cycle.
>>     
>
> Imho, it's bad idea -- create release with so important bug. It's not
> coda, unionfs or something else. It's very useful.
> I think, postpone release for fix this issue -- more fine.
>   

Ditto, same thing with the recent nve fixes. Why release known broken 
code when there are tested patches available? Whats the worst that will 
happen? It wont work? Thats already the case...