From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 10:26:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C28037B401 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:26:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BB743F85 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:26:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kkonaka@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id h74HQgRM025142 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:26:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.tcsamerica.com ([216.130.131.138]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/8.12.9/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id h74HQb9d021879; Mon, 4 Aug 2003 10:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 13:27:11 -0400 Message-ID: From: kkonaka@mac.com To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: coexsiting two network (addresses) on a single ivp4 link X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 17:26:43 -0000 howdy, what kind of things go wrong if I'd put two ipv4 networks on a single ethernet link? eg., put 192.168.1/24 and 192.168.3/24 on a single segment. kenji