From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 24 19:35:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CE6A816A4CE; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:35:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mailhub01.unibe.ch (mailhub01.unibe.ch [130.92.9.52])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 647CE43D1D; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:35:18 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from roth@speedy.unibe.ch)
Received: from localhost (scanhub01-eth0.unibe.ch [130.92.254.65])
	by mailhub01.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3EAB025BCE0; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:35:17 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mailhub01.unibe.ch ([130.92.9.52])
 by localhost (scanhub01 [130.92.254.65]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 26085-04-97; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:35:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from asterix.unibe.ch (asterix.unibe.ch [130.92.64.4])
	by mailhub01.unibe.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2456E25BDCF; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:35:16 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from speedy.unibe.ch (speedy [130.92.64.35])
	by asterix.unibe.ch (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i6OJZF126566;
	Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:35:15 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from roth@localhost)
	by speedy.unibe.ch (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.9/Submit) id i6OJZFsx004639;
	Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:35:15 +0200 (MEST)
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:35:15 +0200
From: Tobias Roth <roth@iam.unibe.ch>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040724193515.GA4208@speedy.unibe.ch>
References: <20040724150905.GA998@rogue.acs-et.com>
	<4102B1BF.4040106@FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4102B1BF.4040106@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-message-flag: Warning! Using Outlook is insecure and promotes virus
	distribution. Please use a different email client.
X-Virus-checked: by University of Berne
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: change in ports rc.d script behaviour
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:35:18 -0000

[snip questions about breakage and backing out requests]

guys, this is -CURRENT. it's normal that some changes break other things.
what's the point in complaining this breaking some ports? if you run
-CURRENT on a production box, you usually are aware of what you are
risking.

also, the time chosen for this upgrade is as good as any. in fact, i even
think this is a good timing, since 5.3 is getting closer.

and it's not  mikes responsibility to fix every port this breaks.

please everyone stop complaining and calm down, or this will end in a
major bikeshed.

cheers, t.