From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 12:14:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E31016A4CE for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:14:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com (smtp-send.myrealbox.com [192.108.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736AE43FD7 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:14:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wa1ter@myrealbox.com) Received: from myrealbox.com wa1ter@smtp-send.myrealbox.com [67.119.36.214] $ on Novell NetWare via secured & encrypted transport (TLS); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:14:24 -0700 Message-ID: <3FC65B59.6060405@myrealbox.com> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:15:21 -0800 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031127 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Turkeys and dynamic linking X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 20:14:22 -0000 To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one! And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the performance issues associated with dynamic linking? Do they do anything special, or just ignore the whole thing?