From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 9 07:59:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF7816A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:59:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC2843D46 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:59:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i897xVNe073593 for ; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 09:59:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i897xUYC073556 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 9 Sep 2004 09:59:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ei.bzerk.org: bulk set sender to mail25@bzerk.org using -f Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 09:59:29 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040909075928.GA50494@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: release build breaks in src/release/scripts/split-file.sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 07:59:27 -0000 I can't successfully build a release of RELENG_5 on my build machine (releng_5_2, releng_5_1 and releng_4 are OK) because of an issue with /bin/sh manifesting itself in the split-file.sh script. Here's the problem: $ uname -r # this is the build machine 5.1-RELEASE-p16 $ i=1 $ i=$((i + 1)) arith: syntax error: "i + 1" $ uname -r 5.3-ALPHA $ i=1 $ i=$((i + 1)) $ echo $i 2 Is this a known issue and has anyone got a workaround for this (I can't upgrade the build machine, at least not a.t.m.) thanks, Ruben