From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 28 00:44:13 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D1F16A417;
	Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9094713C45A;
	Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA549207E;
	Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:44:04 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL
X-Spam-Learn: disabled
X-Spam-Score: -0.2/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on tim.des.no
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151312049;
	Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:44:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id CA2C9844A1; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:44:03 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
References: <86d4rn1kln.fsf@ds4.des.no> <ygeejc3ck1z.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
	<86sl0jywii.fsf@ds4.des.no> <yged4rncetu.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
	<86abmryun9.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080127184656.B60477@fledge.watson.org>
	<86myqrxaw3.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20080127204825.J71547@fledge.watson.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:44:03 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20080127204825.J71547@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's
	message of "Sun\, 27 Jan 2008 20\:49\:47 +0000 \(GMT\)")
Message-ID: <86ir1eye24.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: resolver change?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:44:13 -0000

Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> On the grounds that paranoia is clearly better, my suggestion at this
> point would be to run tcpdump between the caching resolver and ntpd
> and see what is actually going on the wire.

In this case, they're on the same machine.  I'm not sure how well
tcpdump works on loopback devices...

> The name server should be rotating them in reply, and it would be good
> to confirm that it's doing that.

The results from host(1) seem to indicate that it does.

> It would also be good to check that it's looking up what you think
> it's looking up, and indeed, what it should be looking at.

Not sure what you mean by this...

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no