From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Jun 1 18:12:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from theory1.physics.iisc.ernet.in (theory1.physics.iisc.ernet.in [144.16.71.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B86D637BAA6 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2000 18:12:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in) Received: (qmail 12470 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2000 01:11:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO theory3.physics.iisc.ernet.in) (qmailr@144.16.71.158) by theory1.physics.iisc.ernet.in with SMTP; 2 Jun 2000 01:11:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 9765 invoked by uid 211); 2 Jun 2000 01:11:58 -0000 Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 06:41:58 +0530 From: Rahul Siddharthan To: chip Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFCE Window Manager Message-ID: <20000602064157.A9760@physics.iisc.ernet.in> Mail-Followup-To: chip , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG References: <00060117263800.82982@chip.wiegand.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <00060117263800.82982@chip.wiegand.org>; from chip@wiegand.org on Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 05:22:24PM -0700 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.0.36 i686 X-Question: Do you enjoy reading pointless headers? Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org chip said on Jun 1, 2000 at 17:22:24: > I just recently changed from using KDE to using XFCE and find it > quite nice, certainly much faster than the graphics heavy KDE. And it > will run the few KDE apps that I use without a problem. I am wondering > about others impressions and experience with XFCE? I have also used > Afterstep but think I might just stick with XFCE. Themes and other > fancy eye-candy don't mean much to me, just a clean interface where I > can get some work done, and TWM is a bit too sparton. I like XFCE too. But KDE apps will run on any window manager, even TWM, if you have the KDE and QT libs installed. R. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message