From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 20 12:24:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from server03.net-all.com.br (server-03.net-all.com.br [200.245.195.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23B6111BF for ; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 12:24:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcds@brasmail.com.br) Received: from server03 (server03.net-all.com.br [127.0.0.1]) by server03.net-all.com.br (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with SMTP id br for ; Sat, 20 Feb 1999 18:24:41 -0200 From: "Jose Carlos da Silva" Organization: ALLNET! Internet To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 18:24:41 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: off-site secondary DNS Reply-To: jcds@brasmail.com.br References: <19990220194927.SBRW3226200.mta2-rme@wocker> In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d) Message-Id: <19990220202446.B23B6111BF@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hometeam, Em 20 Feb 99, voce escreveu: > why access so often ? The only advantage to use a small refresh value is to force secondaries to load updates more frequently. It can be useful in zones which are changed continuously, but it is not recomended for normal zones, where a daily update shoud be enough. Regards, o-----------------( Jose Carlos da Silva )-----------------o | Administrador de Rede - WebMaster - jcds@brasmail.com.br | | ALLNET! Provedor Internet http://www.allnet.com.br | | Brasmail Internet Services http://www.brasmail.com.br | | Central Brasileira de Listas http://www.listas.nu | | Sao Paulo - SP - Brasil Fone: (011)3061-0088 | o----------------------------------------------------------o To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message